Could there be a greater act of cinÂeÂmatÂic sacÂriÂlege than colÂorizÂing CitÂiÂzen Kane? For most of the past 78 years since its preÂmiere, Orson Welles’ debut feaÂture has been wideÂly conÂsidÂered the greatÂest motion picÂture ever made: witÂness, for instance, its domÂiÂnaÂtion of Sight & Sound magÂaÂzine’s critÂics poll from 1962 until its slip to secÂond place under Alfred HitchÂcockÂ’s VerÂtiÂgo in 2012. ArtisÂtiÂcalÂly innoÂvÂaÂtive in ways that still influÂence movies today, it would seem that CitÂiÂzen Kane requires no help from subÂseÂquent genÂerÂaÂtions. But that didÂn’t stop Ted TurnÂer, the media mogul whose preÂviÂous colÂorizaÂtions of CasablanÂca, King Kong, and The PhiladelÂphia StoÂry had already disÂheartÂened not just lovers of clasÂsic HolÂlyÂwood films but those films’ surÂvivÂing makÂers as well.
“TurnÂer EnterÂtainÂment ComÂpaÂny, which had obtained the home video rights to CitÂiÂzen Kane in 1986, announced with much fanÂfare on JanÂuÂary 29, 1989 its plans to colÂorize Welles’ first HolÂlyÂwood movie,” writes Ray KelÂly at Wellesnet. “There was an immeÂdiÂate backÂlash with the Welles estate and DirecÂtors Guild of AmerÂiÂca threatÂenÂing legal action.”
Welles himÂself had died in 1985, but the filmÂmakÂer HenÂry Jaglom quotÂed the direcÂtor of CitÂiÂzen Kane as imporÂtunÂing him not to “let Ted TurnÂer deface my movie with his crayons.” UltiÂmateÂly TurnÂer’s crayons were indeed stayed, but for legal reaÂsons: a review of Welles’ iniÂtial conÂtract with RKO “revealed he had been givÂen absolute artisÂtic conÂtrol over his first HolÂlyÂwood film, which it specÂiÂfied would be a black-and-white picÂture” — an odd specÂiÂfiÂcaÂtion to declare back in 1940, but declared nonetheÂless.
Before that disÂcovÂery, “a team at ColÂor SysÂtems TechÂnolÂoÂgy Inc. in MariÂna del Rey, CalÂiÂforÂnia” had already “secretÂly colÂorized a porÂtion of Orson Welles’ landÂmark black and white film”: its final ten minÂutes, RoseÂbud and all. The only known surÂvivÂing footage of this project — which took CitÂiÂzen Kane and not just colÂorized it but also, of course, reduced it to the resÂoÂluÂtion and aspect ratio of 1980s teleÂviÂsion — is includÂed in the BBC AreÂna docÂuÂmenÂtary The ComÂplete CitÂiÂzen Kane, the relÂeÂvant clip of which appears at the top of the post. KelÂly quotes William SchaÂefÂfer, assisÂtant art direcÂtor at CST at the time, as rememÂberÂing the results fondÂly: “I thought it looked fine.” Then again, SchaÂefÂfer had nevÂer actuÂalÂly seen the real CitÂiÂzen Kane — and as for the rest of us, we perÂhaps breathe a litÂtle easÂiÂer knowÂing that VerÂtiÂgo is already in colÂor.
RelatÂed ConÂtent:
Orson Welles Explains Why IgnoÂrance Was His Major “Gift” to CitÂiÂzen Kane
Jorge Luis Borges Reviews CitÂiÂzen Kane — and Gets a Response from Orson Welles
DonÂald DeconÂstructs CitÂiÂzen Kane
Based in Seoul, ColÂin MarÂshall writes and broadÂcasts on cities, lanÂguage, and culÂture. His projects include the book The StateÂless City: a Walk through 21st-CenÂtuÂry Los AngeÂles and the video series The City in CinÂeÂma. FolÂlow him on TwitÂter at @colinmarshall or on FaceÂbook.
Would actuÂalÂly be nice to see/hear the clip withÂout the dreadÂful narÂraÂtion … SMH
Please colÂorize the 1940s movie Brigham Young with the cast Dean JagÂger, VinÂcent Price, John CarÂraÂdine, Tyrone PowÂer, LinÂda ParÂnel. The new GenÂerÂaÂtion prefers colÂor to Black and white and this colÂor verÂsion would be a big comÂmodÂiÂty for hunÂdreds of thouÂsands of peoÂple globÂalÂly. Please Make these Black and white films popÂuÂlar again. But please do Brigham Young first. MemÂbers of the Church of Jesus Christ of latÂter day Saints globÂalÂly would recoup your investÂment easÂiÂly. Thank you, Dave C. AlexanÂder. My address is 3408 HumÂboldt Way, SacraÂmenÂto, 95864–3820 , My cellÂphone numÂber is 916 952 8021
“Could there be a greater act of cinÂeÂmatÂic sacÂriÂlege than colÂorizÂing CitÂiÂzen Kane?” I used a machine learnÂing algoÂrithm to make CitÂiÂzen Kane 3D and screen it on the Big Screen beta VR app. I kept it black & white though. The cinÂeÂmatogÂraÂphy does look real nice in 3D and it doesÂn’t ruin the lightÂing and style in the way that a colÂorizaÂtion would.