The 1937 Nazi DegenÂerÂate Art ExhiÂbiÂtion disÂplayed the art of Paul Klee, WassÂiÂly KandinÂsky, Georg Grosz, and many more interÂnaÂtionÂalÂly famous modÂernists with maxÂiÂmum prejÂuÂdice. Ripped from the walls of GerÂman museÂums, the 740 paintÂings and sculpÂtures were thrown togethÂer in disÂarÂray and surÂroundÂed by derogaÂtoÂry grafÂfiÂti and hell-house effects. Right down the street was the respectable Great GerÂman Art ExhiÂbiÂtion, designed as counÂterÂproÂgramÂming “to show the works that Hitler approved of—depicting statÂuesque blonde nudes along with ideÂalÂized solÂdiers and landÂscapes,” writes Lucy Burns at the BBC.
ViewÂers were supÂposed to sneer and recoil at the modÂern art, and most did, but whether they were gawkÂers, Nazi symÂpaÂthizÂers, or art fans in mournÂing, the exhibÂit drew masÂsive crowds. Over a milÂlion peoÂple first attendÂed, three times more than saw the exhiÂbiÂtion of state-sancÂtioned art—or more specifÂiÂcalÂly, art sancÂtioned by Hitler the failed artist, who had endured watchÂing “the realÂisÂtic paintÂings of buildÂings and landÂscapes,” of sturÂdy peasÂants and sufÂferÂing poets, “disÂmissed by the art estabÂlishÂment in favour of abstract and modÂern styles.” The DegenÂerÂate Art ExhiÂbiÂtion “was his moment to get his revenge,” and he had it. Over a hunÂdred artists were denounced as BolÂsheÂviks and Jews bent on corÂruptÂing GerÂman puriÂty.
AfterÂwards, thouÂsands of works of art were destroyed or disÂapÂpeared, as did many of their creÂators. Many artists fled, many could not. Enraged by the eclipse of senÂtiÂmenÂtal acaÂdÂeÂmÂic styles and by his own ignoÂrance, Hitler railed against “works of art which canÂnot be underÂstood in themÂselves,” as he put it in a speech that sumÂmer. These “will nevÂer again find their way to the GerÂman peoÂple.” Many such quoÂtaÂtions surÂroundÂed the offendÂing art. The 1993 docÂuÂmenÂtary above, writÂten, proÂduced, and directÂed by David GruÂbin, tells the stoÂry of the exhiÂbiÂtion, which has in time proven Hitler’s greatÂest culÂture war folÂly. It accomÂplished its immeÂdiÂate purÂpose, but as Jonathan PetropouÂlos, proÂfesÂsor of EuroÂpean HisÂtoÂry at ClareÂmont McKenÂna ColÂlege points out, “this artÂwork became more attracÂtive abroad…. I think that over the longer run it was good for modÂern art to be viewed as someÂthing that the Nazis detestÂed and hatÂed.”
Not every anti-Nazi critÂic saw modÂern art as subÂvertÂing fasÂcism. Ten years after the DegenÂerÂate Art ExhiÂbiÂtion, philosoÂpher Theodor Adorno, himÂself a refugee from Nazism, called ExpresÂsionÂism “a naĂŻve aspect of libÂerÂal trustÂfulÂness,” on a conÂtinÂuÂum between fasÂcist tools like FuturÂism and “the ideÂolÂoÂgy of the cinÂeÂma.” NonetheÂless, it was Hitler who most bore out Adorno’s genÂerÂal obserÂvaÂtion: “Taste is the most accuÂrate seisÂmoÂgraph of hisÂtorÂiÂcal expeÂriÂence…. ReactÂing against itself, it recÂogÂnizes its own lack of taste.” The hysÂterÂiÂcal perÂforÂmance of disÂgust surÂroundÂing so-called “degenÂerÂate art” turned the exhibÂit into a senÂsaÂtion, a blockÂbuster that, if it did not prove the virtues of modÂernism, showed many around the world that the Nazis were as crude, dim, and vicious as they alleged their supÂposed eneÂmies to be.
In the docÂuÂmenÂtary, you’ll see actuÂal footage of the theÂatriÂcal exhiÂbiÂtion, juxÂtaÂposed with film of a 1992 Berlin exhiÂbiÂtion of much of that forÂmerÂly degenÂerÂate art. Restaged DegenÂerÂate Art ExhiÂbiÂtions have become very popÂuÂlar in the art word, bringÂing togethÂer artists who need no furÂther expoÂsure, in order to hisÂtorÂiÂcalÂly reenÂact, in some fashÂion, the expeÂriÂence of seeÂing them all togethÂer for the first time. From a recent hisÂtorÂiÂcal review at New York’s Neue GalÂlerie to the digÂiÂtal exhibÂit at MoMA.org, degenÂerÂate art retÂroÂspecÂtives show, as Adorno wrote, that indeed “taste is the most accuÂrate seisÂmoÂgraph of hisÂtorÂiÂcal expeÂriÂence.”
The origÂiÂnal exhiÂbiÂtion “went on tour all over GerÂmany,” writes Burns, “where it was seen by a milÂlion more peoÂple.” ThouÂsands of ordiÂnary GerÂmans who went to jeer at it were exposed to modÂern art for the first time. MilÂlions more peoÂple have learned the names and styles of these artists by learnÂing about the hisÂtoÂry of Nazism and its cult of petÂtiÂness and perÂsonÂal revenge. Learn much more in the excelÂlent docÂuÂmenÂtary above and at our preÂviÂous post on the DegenÂerÂate Art ExhiÂbiÂtion.
DegenÂerÂate Art — 1993, The Nazis vs. ExpresÂsionÂism will be added to our list of Free DocÂuÂmenÂtaries, a subÂset of our colÂlecÂtion, 4,000+ Free Movies Online: Great ClasÂsics, Indies, Noir, WestÂerns, DocÂuÂmenÂtaries & More
RelatÂed ConÂtent:
Josh Jones is a writer and musiÂcian based in Durham, NC. FolÂlow him at @jdmagness
ComÂing soon to a museÂum near you…
@ gwr Soon? Well, you’re a bit late. :)
1991 “DegenÂerÂate Art — The Fate of the Avant-Garde in Nazi-GerÂmany”, exhiÂbiÂtion in Los AngeÂles. AfterÂwards: ChicaÂgo and WashÂingÂton.
The same exhiÂbiÂtion went to Europe: “Entartete KunÂst”. Altes MuseÂum am LustÂgarten, Berlin, 1992. Then in othÂer GerÂman museÂums too.
In 1988 I visÂitÂed “Entartete Musik”, TonÂhalle DĂĽsÂselÂdorf. Also very impressÂing. (And depressÂing for a jazz lover.)
More at: https://www.thebreman.org/Exhibitions/Online-Exhibitions/Entartete-Musik
& https://www.dw.com/cda/en/the-nazis-take-on-degenerate-music/a‑16834697