OverÂpopÂuÂlaÂtion, manipÂuÂlaÂtive polÂiÂtics, imbalÂances of sociÂetal powÂer, addicÂtive drugs, even more addicÂtive techÂnoloÂgies: these and othÂer develÂopÂments have pushed not just democÂraÂcy but civÂiÂlizaÂtion itself to the brink. Or at least author Aldous HuxÂley saw it that way, and he told AmerÂiÂca so when he appeared on The Mike WalÂlace InterÂview in 1958. (You can also read a tranÂscript here.) “There are a numÂber of imperÂsonÂal forces which are pushÂing in the direcÂtion of less and less freeÂdom,” he told the newÂly famous news anchor, “and I also think that there are a numÂber of techÂnoÂlogÂiÂcal devices which anyÂbody who wishÂes to use can use to accelÂerÂate this process of going away from freeÂdom, of imposÂing conÂtrol.”
HuxÂley’s best-known novÂel Brave New World has remained relÂeÂvant since its first pubÂliÂcaÂtion in 1932. He appeared on WalÂlace’s show to proÂmote Brave New World RevisÂitÂed (first pubÂlished as EneÂmies of FreeÂdom), a colÂlecÂtion of essays on how much more rapidÂly than expectÂed the real world had come to resemÂble the dystopia he’d imagÂined a quarÂter-cenÂtuÂry earÂliÂer.
Some of the reaÂsons behind his grim preÂdicÂtions now seem overÂstatÂed — he points out that “in the underÂdeÂvelÂoped counÂtries actuÂalÂly the stanÂdard of livÂing is at present falling,” though the reverse has now been true for quite some time — but othÂers, from the vanÂtage of the 21st cenÂtuÂry, sound almost too mild.
“We mustÂn’t be caught by surÂprise by our own advancÂing techÂnolÂoÂgy,” HuxÂley says in that time before smartÂphones, before the interÂnet, before perÂsonÂal comÂputÂers, before even cable teleÂviÂsion. We also mustÂn’t be caught by surÂprise by those who seek indefÂiÂnite powÂer over us: to do that requires “conÂsent of the ruled,” someÂthing acquirable by addicÂtive subÂstances — both pharÂmaÂcoÂlogÂiÂcal and techÂnoÂlogÂiÂcal — as well as “new techÂniques of proÂpaÂganÂda.” All of this has the effect of “bypassÂing the sort of ratioÂnal side of man and appealÂing to his subÂconÂscious and his deepÂer emoÂtions, and his physÂiÂolÂoÂgy even, and so, makÂing him actuÂalÂly love his slavÂery.”
WalÂlace’s quesÂtions bring HuxÂley to a quesÂtion of his own: “What does a democÂraÂcy depend on? A democÂraÂcy depends on the indiÂvidÂual votÂer makÂing an intelÂliÂgent and ratioÂnal choice for what he regards as his enlightÂened self-interÂest, in any givÂen cirÂcumÂstance.” But democÂraÂcy-debilÂiÂtatÂing comÂmerÂcial and politÂiÂcal proÂpaÂganÂda appeals “directÂly to these unconÂscious forces below the surÂfaces so that you are, in a way, makÂing nonÂsense of the whole demoÂcÂraÂtÂic proÂceÂdure, which is based on conÂscious choice on ratioÂnal ground.” Hence the imporÂtance of teachÂing peoÂple “to be on their guard against the sort of verÂbal booÂby traps into which they are always being led.” The skill has arguably only grown in imporÂtance since, as has his final thought in the broadÂcast: “I still believe in democÂraÂcy, if we can make the best of the creÂative activÂiÂties of the peoÂple on top plus those of the peoÂple on the botÂtom, so much the betÂter.”
RelatÂed ConÂtent:
Aldous HuxÂley Reads DraÂmaÂtized VerÂsion of Brave New World
HuxÂley to Orwell: My HellÂish Vision of the Future is BetÂter Than Yours (1949)
An AniÂmatÂed Aldous HuxÂley IdenÂtiÂfies the DystopiÂan Threats to Our FreeÂdom (1958)
Aldous HuxÂley PreÂdicts in 1950 What the World Will Look Like in the Year 2000
Based in Seoul, ColÂin MarÂshall writes and broadÂcasts on cities and culÂture. His projects include the book The StateÂless City: a Walk through 21st-CenÂtuÂry Los AngeÂles and the video series The City in CinÂeÂma. FolÂlow him on TwitÂter at @colinmarshall or on FaceÂbook.
Such a visionÂary.
PowÂerÂful and poignant, if only we could utilise his teachÂings and ushÂer in a new era of govÂerÂnance.