You’d be forÂgivÂen for assumÂing that the Bauhaus, the modÂern art and design moveÂment that emerged from the eponyÂmous GerÂman art school in the 1920s and 30s, didÂn’t involve many women. PerÂhaps the famous near-indusÂtriÂal ausÂterÂiÂty of its aesÂthetÂic, espeÂcialÂly at large scales, has stereoÂtypÂiÂcal assoÂciÂaÂtions with maleÂness, but also, Bauhaus’ most oft-refÂerÂenced leadÂing lights — Paul Klee, WalÂter Gropius, WassÂiÂly KandinÂsky, LásÂzlĂł Moholy-Nagy, Oskar SchlemÂmer — all hapÂpened to be men. But if we seek out the women of the Bauhaus, what can we learn?
“When it opened, the Bauhaus school declared itself proÂgresÂsive and modÂern and advoÂcatÂed equalÂiÂty for the sexÂes, which was rare at the time,” says EveÂlyn Adams in her short video on the Women of the Bauhaus above. “ValÂue was placed on skill rather than genÂder. ClassÂes weren’t segÂreÂgatÂed, and women were free to select whichevÂer subÂjects they wantÂed.”
This had an underÂstandÂable appeal, and in the school’s first year more women applied than men. But alas, “in realÂiÂty, despite havÂing radÂiÂcal aspiÂraÂtions, the men in charge of the school repÂreÂsentÂed the sociÂetal attiÂtudes of the time. If everyÂone was welÂcomed as equals, then why did none of the women reach the same levÂel of recogÂniÂtion as Paul Klee or WassÂiÂly KandinÂsky?”
The stoÂry of Gertrud Arndt, one of whose self-porÂtraits appears above and one of whose texÂtiles appears below that, sheds some light on the answer. “She must have felt so optiÂmistic,” writes the New York Times’ Alice RawÂsthorn, when she arrived at the Bauhaus school of art and design in 1923 as “a giftÂed, spirÂitÂed 20-year-old who had won a scholÂarÂship to pay for her studÂies. HavÂing spent sevÂerÂal years workÂing as an apprenÂtice to a firm of archiÂtects, she had set her heart on studyÂing archiÂtecÂture.” But because of a “long-runÂning batÂtle between its foundÂing direcÂtor, the archiÂtect WalÂter Gropius, and one of its most charisÂmatÂic teachÂers, Johannes Itten, who wantÂed to use the school as a vehiÂcle for his quaÂsi-spirÂiÂtuÂal approach to art and design,” the Bauhaus’ house, as it were, had fallÂen out of order.
Alas, “Arndt was told that there was no archiÂtecÂture course for her to join and was disÂpatched to the weavÂing workÂshop.” In recent years, the Bauhaus Archive in Berlin has put on shows to honÂor female Bauhausers like ArdÂnt, texÂtile designÂer BeniÂta Koch-Otte, and theÂater designÂer, illusÂtraÂtor, and colÂor theÂoÂrist Lou SchepÂer-Berkenkamp. “The sitÂuÂaÂtion improved after Gropius sucÂceedÂed in oustÂing Itten in 1923,” writes RawÂsthorn, hirÂing Moholy-Nagy in Itten’s place. “HavÂing ensured that female stuÂdents were givÂen greater freeÂdom, Moholy encourÂaged one of them, MarÂiÂanne Brandt, to join the metÂal workÂshop. She was to become one of Germany’s foreÂmost indusÂtriÂal designÂers durÂing the 1930s,” and her 1924 tea infuser and strainÂer appears just above.
ArtÂsy’s Alexxa GotÂthardt has the stoÂries of more women of the Bauhaus, includÂing Anni Albers, whose 1947 Knot 2 appears just above. Her othÂer work includes “a cotÂton and celÂloÂphane curÂtain that simulÂtaÂneÂousÂly absorbed sound and reflectÂed light” and tapesÂtries that “would go on to have a conÂsidÂerÂable impact on the develÂopÂment of geoÂmetÂric abstracÂtion in the visuÂal arts.” Alma SiedÂhoff-BuschÂer, writes GotÂthardt, dared “to switch from the weavÂing workÂshop to the male-domÂiÂnatÂed wood-sculpÂture departÂment,” where she inventÂed a “small ship-buildÂing game,” picÂtured below and still in proÂducÂtion today, that “manÂiÂfestÂed Bauhaus’s cenÂtral tenets: its 22 blocks, forged in priÂmaÂry colÂors, could be conÂstructÂed into the shape of a boat, but could also be rearranged to allow for creÂative experÂiÂmenÂtaÂtion.”
Bauhaus art and design took critÂiÂcism in its heyÂday, as it still takes critÂiÂcism now, for a cerÂtain coldÂness and sterilÂiÂty — or at least the work of the men of the Bauhaus does. But the more we disÂcovÂer about the lessÂer-known women of the Bauhaus, the more we see how they manÂaged to bring no small degree of humanÂiÂty to its artisÂtic fruits, even to those of its most rigÂorÂous branchÂes. “There is no difÂferÂence between the beauÂtiÂful sex and the strong sex,” Gropius once insistÂed in a someÂwhat self-defeatÂing proÂnounceÂment, but the difÂferÂences between the male and female Bauhausers — in their perÂsonÂalÂiÂties as well as in their work — make the moveÂment look all the richÂer in retÂroÂspect.
RelatÂed ConÂtent:
32,000+ Bauhaus Art Objects Made AvailÂable Online by HarÂvard MuseÂum WebÂsite
Bauhaus, ModÂernism & OthÂer Design MoveÂments Explained by New AniÂmatÂed Video Series
Based in Seoul, ColÂin MarÂshall writes and broadÂcasts on cities and culÂture. He’s at work on the book The StateÂless City: a Walk through 21st-CenÂtuÂry Los AngeÂles, the video series The City in CinÂeÂma, the crowdÂfundÂed jourÂnalÂism project Where Is the City of the Future?, and the Los AngeÂles Review of Books’ Korea Blog. FolÂlow him on TwitÂter at @colinmarshall or on FaceÂbook.
Let’s idenÂtiÂfy one of my favorite phoÂtos, the geoÂmetÂric planÂets cosÂtumes from Oscar SchlemÂmer’s Das TriÂadisÂche BalÂlett 1922 by Bauhaus TheÂater, which toured Europe in the 1930s. The clumÂsy cosÂtumes intenÂtionÂalÂly limÂitÂed moveÂment.
MarÂguerite WildenÂhain and the Bauhaus: An EyeÂwitÂness AntholÂoÂgy. Dean and GeralÂdine Schwarz.