No hisÂtorÂiÂcal leap forÂward has changed human culÂture more than the harÂnessÂing and comÂmerÂcialÂizaÂtion of elecÂtricÂiÂty. It may seem banal to point out such a truism—of course, nothÂing in the modÂern world would be what it is withÂout the furiÂous activÂiÂty of Thomas EdiÂson, NikoÂla TesÂla, and so many othÂer invenÂtors and earÂly elecÂtriÂcal engiÂneers. But the scope of electricity’s role in the music of the past hunÂdred plus years becomes truÂly awe-inspirÂing when we see it mapped out in the blueÂprint-like graphÂic above, “ElecÂtric Love,” inspired by cirÂcuit diaÂgrams from the 1950s for a Theremin. (You can view the graphÂic in a largÂer, zoomable fashÂion here.)
As we notÂed in an earÂliÂer post, designÂer of “ElecÂtric Love” James Quail has creÂatÂed a simÂiÂlar diaÂgram for AlterÂnaÂtive and Indie rock, based on the cirÂcuit layÂout for a 1954 tranÂsisÂtor radio. In the elecÂtronÂic music verÂsion here, not only does Quail draw on oldÂer techÂnolÂoÂgy, but he reachÂes back to earÂliÂer ancesÂtors as well: to EdiÂson, AlexanÂder GraÂham Bell rival Elisha Gray, and Édouard-LĂ©on Scott de MarÂtÂinville, invenÂtor of the obscure earÂly recordÂing device the phoÂnauÂtoÂgraph.
It’s a choice that foreÂgrounds just how much techÂniÂcians and engiÂneers conÂtributed directÂly to the sound of the modÂern world. Among them, of course, is the late Robert Moog, invenÂtor of the portable anaÂlog synÂtheÂsizÂer that become ubiqÂuiÂtous in nearÂly every genre of modÂern music, and whose work “was actuÂalÂly based,” notes Wired, “on techÂnolÂoÂgy from the 1800s.”
When it comes to the musiÂcians who took this techÂnolÂoÂgy and transÂformed it into avant-gardism and dance records, the relaÂtionÂships are comÂplex and perÂhaps imposÂsiÂble to fulÂly repÂreÂsent in simÂple terms givÂen the numÂber of indiÂrect influÂences through samÂpling techÂnolÂoÂgy. But “ElecÂtric Love” does an admirable job of showÂing how difÂfuse and diverse the music made by anaÂlog and digÂiÂtal techÂnolÂoÂgy has been. From the musique conÂcrete of Pierre SchafÂfer, the experÂiÂmenÂtalÂism of KarlÂheinz StockÂhausen and Arnold SchoenÂberg, comÂmerÂcial avant-garde of Delia DerÂbyshire and Wendy CarÂlos, minÂiÂmalÂism of Steve Reich and Philip Glass, new wave of Kraftwerk, house and hip hop of DerÂrick May, AfriÂka BamÂbaataa and Kool DJ Herc, ambiÂent soundÂscapes of BriÂan Eno, jitÂtery elecÂtronÂiÂca of Aphex Twin, synÂthÂpop of Depeche Mode and New Order…
It’s seemÂingÂly all there, and everyÂthing in-between, conÂnectÂed, Quail says, accordÂing to “comÂmon link[s]—whether that’s a style, or an instruÂment, or an influÂence on one anothÂer.” Even The BeaÂtÂles and Pink Floyd show up, preÂsumÂably for their creÂative stuÂdio experÂiÂments. On the whole, howÂevÂer, most of the smallÂer names here are much less familÂiar by comÂparÂiÂson to Quail’s AlterÂnaÂtive chart, but for true fans of elecÂtronÂic music, this only means there’s more to disÂcovÂer in this visuÂal comÂpendiÂum of “over 200 invenÂtors, innoÂvaÂtors, artists, comÂposers and musiÂcians.” You can purÂchase “ElecÂtric Love” as a print from design house Dorothy.
RelatÂed ConÂtent:
The HisÂtoÂry of ElecÂtronÂic Music in 476 Tracks (1937–2001)
Josh Jones is a writer and musiÂcian based in Durham, NC. FolÂlow him at @jdmagness
Where are Delia DerÂbyshire, Clara RockÂmore, Suzanne Ciani, Pauline OlivÂeros, Daphne Oram and so on and so on?
Um, Look again. Delia DerÂbyshire, Pauline OlivÂeros, and Daphne Oram are all on the diaÂgram. I even menÂtion DerÂbyshire above.
With so much conÂnecÂtion to the late Dr. Moog in this artiÂcle, it would be remiss to not call out the diaÂgram for its very direct conÂnecÂtion to him. This diaÂgram for a vacÂuÂum tube theremin was origÂiÂnalÂly pubÂlished by the young Moog when he was 19, appearÂing in the JanÂuÂary 1954 ediÂtion of Radio & TeleÂviÂsion News MagÂaÂzine. It is also sigÂnifÂiÂcant for being the diaÂgram of the very first elecÂtronÂic instruÂment designed and marÂketÂed by him, a decade before the world first came to know the name MOOG in conÂnecÂtion with the synÂtheÂsizÂer.