MarÂshall McLuhan, writes novÂelÂist and artist DouÂglas CouÂpÂland, entered the zeitÂgeist in the 1960s as “a guru or as a vilÂlain – as a harÂbinÂger of the flowÂerÂing of culÂture, or of its death,” a “fudÂdy-dudÂdy fiftysomeÂthing EngÂlish lit proÂfesÂsor from ToronÂto” whose disÂtincÂtive research interÂests and even more disÂtincÂtive habits of mind empowÂered him to come up with still-resÂoÂnant insights into the modÂern media landÂscape. He knew “that the point of much of techÂnolÂoÂgy, TV, for instance, wasÂn’t the conÂtent of the shows you were watchÂing on it. Rather, what matÂtered was mereÂly the fact that you were watchÂing TV. The act of anaÂlyzÂing the conÂtent of TV – or of othÂer mediÂums – is either senÂtiÂmenÂtal or it’s beside the point.” The mediÂum, in othÂer words, is the mesÂsage.
That best-known of McLuhan’s prophetÂic one-linÂers (on which he expands in the ABC Radio NationÂal talk below) remains as true now as it was when it first appeared in his book UnderÂstandÂing Media: The ExtenÂsions of Man in 1964.
CouÂpÂland emphaÂsizes that difÂferÂent kinds of media, then as now, “force you to favor cerÂtain parts of your brain over othÂers,” which we denizens of the 21st cenÂtuÂry know from intenÂsive daiÂly expeÂriÂence: “that hour you spent on FaceÂbook came at the expense of some othÂer way of using your brain, most likeÂly TV viewÂing or book-readÂing, though as books and TV recede, ever more web-mediÂatÂed activÂiÂties will replace each othÂer to the point where we’ll have long forÂgotÂten what the pre-elecÂtronÂic mind was to begin with.”
CouÂpÂland once wrote a kind of biogÂraÂphy of McLuhan that disÂtilled the thinker’s life, work, and curÂrent relÂeÂvance into less than 250 pages, but the video at the top of the post, comÂmisÂsioned by Al Jazeera from aniÂmaÂtor Daniel SavÂage and narÂratÂed by Hong Kong activist Alex Chow, does it in just over two minÂutes. Chow reminds us that, even today, “if you don’t underÂstand the mediÂum, you don’t fulÂly underÂstand the mesÂsage,” lookÂing back to the invenÂtion of the printÂing press, and thus of mass media, and how its forms “changed our colÂlecÂtive expeÂriÂence. It informed our colÂlecÂtive idenÂtiÂty, how we imagÂined ourÂselves.” In what McLuhan called the “elecÂtric enviÂronÂment,” where “everyÂthing hapÂpens at once. There’s no conÂtiÂnuÂity, there’s no conÂnecÂtion, there’s no folÂlow-through. It’s just all now,” we will expeÂriÂence the end of secreÂcy, and with it “the end of monopÂoÂlies of knowlÂedge.”
55 years ago, McLuhan wrote that “the next mediÂum, whatÂevÂer it is – it may be the extenÂsion of conÂsciousÂness – will include teleÂviÂsion as its conÂtent, not as its enviÂronÂment. A comÂputÂer as a research and comÂmuÂniÂcaÂtion instruÂment could enhance retrieval, obsoÂlesce mass library orgaÂniÂzaÂtion, retrieve the indiÂvidÂuÂal’s encyÂcloÂpeÂdic funcÂtion and flip it into a priÂvate line to speedÂiÂly taiÂlored data of a salÂable kind.” As we’ve since disÂcovÂered, these develÂopÂments have both their upsides and downÂsides. But as CouÂpÂland writes, conÂsidÂer that pasÂsage seriÂousÂly and “see if it doesÂn’t give you a chill.”
RelatÂed ConÂtent:
The VisionÂary Thought of MarÂshall McLuhan, IntroÂduced and DemysÂtiÂfied by Tom Wolfe
MarÂshall McLuhan on the StuÂpidÂest Debate in the HisÂtoÂry of DebatÂing (1976)
McLuhan Said “The MediÂum Is The MesÂsage”; Two Pieces Of Media Decode the Famous Phrase
Hear MarÂshall McLuhan’s The MediÂum is the MasÂsage (1967)
Based in Seoul, ColÂin MarÂshall writes and broadÂcasts on cities and culÂture. He’s at work on a book about Los AngeÂles, A Los AngeÂles Primer, the video series The City in CinÂeÂma, the crowdÂfundÂed jourÂnalÂism project Where Is the City of the Future?, and the Los AngeÂles Review of Books’ Korea Blog. FolÂlow him on TwitÂter at @colinmarshall or on FaceÂbook.
McLuhan would preÂsumÂably be the first to appreÂciÂate the irony of his mesÂsage being reduced to a 2 minute aniÂmatÂed media clip :)
ExactÂly my thoughts! :)
I realÂly liked the music. Is it origÂiÂnal?
PerÂfeito, Ingrid. Falou direÂtaÂmente comiÂgo.