Charles GuiÂteau, the man who assasÂsiÂnatÂed James Garfield, tried to argue in court that he just shot the presÂiÂdent — the docÂtors actuÂalÂly killed him. Though GuiÂteau was ultiÂmateÂly hanged for his crime in 1882, he did have a point. Garfield’s docÂtor, William Bliss, jammed his unsterÂilÂized finÂgers in the presÂiÂdenÂtial wound in an attempt to pull out the bulÂlet. So did a host of othÂer speÂcialÂists. PresÂiÂdent Garfield died 80 days latÂer of, among othÂer things, sepÂsis. It was latÂer conÂcludÂed that the presÂiÂdent would have likeÂly surÂvived if the docÂtors had kept their hands to themÂselves.
Garfield’s death was one of the catÂaÂlysts that helped popÂuÂlarÂize Joseph Lister’s ideas about bacÂteÂria, a conÂcept that vastÂly improved the qualÂiÂty of medÂical care. A hunÂdred years latÂer, for examÂple, Ronald ReaÂgan sufÂfered from almost an idenÂtiÂcal bulÂlet wound and was back to work withÂin weeks.
In the 19th cenÂtuÂry and cenÂturies before, disÂeases weren’t well underÂstood and death was mysÂteÂriÂous and divine. In the evanÂgelÂiÂcal revivals of the mid-19th cenÂtuÂry, the end of life was seen as someÂthing to embrace. After all, God was callÂing his believÂers back home. Then with a growÂing underÂstandÂing of germs, that sense of wonÂder with our morÂtalÂiÂty changed. “God hadn’t called the indiÂvidÂual to him,” writes DebÂoÂrah Lutz, scholÂar of VicÂtoÂriÂan culÂture, in The New York Times this week. “Rather, a malÂaÂdy had overÂtakÂen the body. Rather than dying at home, the sick were cartÂed off to hosÂpiÂtals.” Death, in othÂer words, became divorced from everyÂday life.
So from our 21st cenÂtuÂry viewÂpoint, the VicÂtoÂriÂans’ (and their preÂdeÂcesÂsors’) tenÂdenÂcy to colÂlect memenÂtos of the dead, like death masks, might seem grueÂsome. But from their point of view, our panÂicked denial of death would probÂaÂbly seem foolÂish and perÂverse. MorÂtalÂiÂty, after all, is a fact of life.
PrinceÂton University’s LauÂrence HutÂton ColÂlecÂtion has dozens of death masks of famous politiÂcians, philosoÂphers and authors. PeoÂple like Isaac NewÂton, AbraÂham LinÂcoln and Leo TolÂstoy. There’s someÂthing humÂbling about seeÂing these titans of WestÂern culÂture capÂtured at such an intiÂmate moment. Stripped of all the markÂers of class and rank, they look like peoÂple you might see on the street.
Aside from a rather unconÂvincÂing effiÂgy of Queen ElizÂaÂbeth, the colÂlecÂtion feaÂtures few masks of great women. No Jane Austens or EmiÂly DickÂinÂsons here. The colÂlecÂtion also, sadÂly, lacks a mask of James Garfield.
Above you can find death masks of litÂerÂary figÂures from the 14th to earÂly 20th cenÂturies. From top to botÂtom, you will see James Joyce, Goethe, Leo TolÂstoy, Samuel TayÂlor Coleridge, Dante and William Wordsworth.
Jonathan Crow is a Los AngeÂles-based writer and filmÂmakÂer whose work has appeared in Yahoo!, The HolÂlyÂwood Reporter, and othÂer pubÂliÂcaÂtions. You can folÂlow him at @jonccrow. And check out his blog VeepÂtoÂpus, feaÂturÂing lots of picÂtures of vice presÂiÂdents with octoÂpusÂes on their heads.
Here is PresÂiÂdent GarfieldÂ’s death mask. I’ve see it in perÂson and the lightÂing makes it more eerie than in this phoÂto. https://garfieldnps.wordpress.com/2013/06/03/the-president-james-a-garfield-death-mask/
facts like conÂdiÂtions can change
Thanks for very helpÂfulÂly idenÂtiÂfyÂing the men behind the masks…
I haven’t seen TolÂstoy since a dinÂner before his death and, havÂing grown elderÂly, I forÂget what he looked like. Please idenÂtiÂfy each author’s death mask. Thank you.
Dear Sirs,
the artiÂcle is inacÂcuÂrate. AccordÂing to sciÂenÂtifÂic and medÂical researchÂes that took place in 2007, the mask depictÂing Goethe is not a death mask, but a copy of a mask creÂatÂed in 1807, when Goethe was 58 and very much alive.
Source: http://www.welt.de/kultur/article877480/So-sah-Goethe-wirklich-aus.html
Hi Iona, you hovÂer your mouse over the picÂture, a link will appear that conÂtains the name for each picÂture.