BenÂjamin Franklin might have been a brilÂliant author, pubÂlishÂer, sciÂenÂtist, invenÂtor and statesÂman, but he was pretÂty lousy at keepÂing state secrets. That’s the findÂing from a recentÂly declasÂsiÂfied CIA analyÂsis of Franklin’s critÂiÂcalÂly imporÂtant diploÂmatÂic misÂsion to France durÂing the RevÂoÂluÂtionÂary War.
In SepÂtemÂber 1776, Franklin was disÂpatched to Paris to enlist France’s supÂport for the AmerÂiÂcan RevÂoÂluÂtion. At the time, France was still smartÂing from losÂing the SevÂen Years’ War to Britain and was eager to do anyÂthing that could reduce its rival’s powÂer and presÂtige. Franklin’s ComÂmisÂsion ran all kinds of clanÂdesÂtine operÂaÂtions with tacÂit French aid, includÂing procurÂing weapons, supÂplies and monÂey for the AmerÂiÂcan Army; sabÂoÂtagÂing the Portsmouth RoyÂal Navy DockÂyard; and negoÂtiÂatÂing a secret treaty between AmerÂiÂca and France.
And accordÂing the CIA’s in-house pubÂliÂcaÂtion, StudÂies in IntelÂliÂgence, the British knew just about everyÂthing that was going on. “The British had a comÂplete picÂture of AmerÂiÂcan-French activÂiÂties supÂportÂing the war in AmerÂiÂca and of AmerÂiÂcan intenÂtions regardÂing an alliance with France. The British used this intelÂliÂgence effecÂtiveÂly against the AmerÂiÂcan cause.”
Some of the probÂlems with the ComÂmisÂsion seem head-slapÂpingÂly obviÂous. “There was no real physÂiÂcal secuÂriÂty at the ComÂmisÂsion itself. The pubÂlic had access to the manÂsion, docÂuÂments and papers were spread out all over the office, and priÂvate disÂcusÂsions were held in pubÂlic areas.”
One of Franklin’s felÂlow comÂmisÂsionÂers, Arthur Lee, was outÂraged over this lack of secuÂriÂty.
[Lee] wrote that a French offiÂcial “had comÂplained that everyÂthing we did was known to the EngÂlish ambasÂsador, who was always plaguÂing him with the details. No one will be surÂprised at this who knows that we have no time or place approÂpriÂate to our conÂsulÂtaÂtion, but that serÂvants, strangers, and everyÂone else was at libÂerÂty to enter and did conÂstantÂly enter the room while we were talkÂing about pubÂlic busiÂness and that the papers relatÂing to it lay open in rooms of comÂmon and conÂtinÂuÂal resort.
Not surÂprisÂingÂly, the AmerÂiÂcan misÂsion was ridÂdled with British spies; chief among them was Franklin’s long-time friend Edward BanÂcroft, who, as the Commission’s secÂreÂtary, had comÂplete access to all of its papers. He was reportÂedÂly paid a princeÂly sum of 1000 pounds a year by the British Empire to play the part of an EnlightÂenÂment-era James Bond.
Lee susÂpectÂed BanÂcroft of being a spy, but Franklin disÂmissed his conÂcerns largeÂly because he greatÂly disÂliked Lee. “[Franklin’s] attiÂtude … is all too familÂiar among polÂiÂcyÂmakÂers and statesÂmen,” writes the CIA. “His ego may have overÂwhelmed his comÂmon sense.”
In the end, the anaÂlyst lays the blame on these catÂaÂstrophÂic lapsÂes in intelÂliÂgence on that inflatÂed ego.
“By the time [Franklin] arrived in Paris in late 1776, he was elderÂly and had litÂtle interÂest in the adminÂisÂtraÂtive aspects of the ComÂmisÂsion. Franklin was wideÂly recÂogÂnized as a statesÂman, sciÂenÂtist, and intelÂlecÂtuÂal. While highÂly respectÂed, he was also vain, obstiÂnate, and jealÂous of his preÂrogÂaÂtives and repÂuÂtaÂtion. … The ComÂmisÂsion was “under proÂtecÂtion” of the French GovÂernÂment, and Franklin may have underÂesÂtiÂmatÂed British capaÂbilÂiÂties to operÂate in a third counÂtry. In any event, he did nothÂing to creÂate a secuÂriÂty conÂsciousÂness at the ComÂmisÂsion.”
The porÂtrait that the CIA paints is indeed a grim one that in difÂferÂent cirÂcumÂstances could have lost the war. ThankÂfulÂly, Britain proved wholÂly unable to use this wealth of inforÂmaÂtion to turn the tide of the war. As the CIA wryÂly notes: “PerÂhaps the greatÂest irony in the whole stoÂry of the penÂeÂtraÂtion of the AmerÂiÂcan ComÂmisÂsion is that, while British intelÂliÂgence activÂiÂties were highÂly sucÂcessÂful, British polÂiÂcy was a total failÂure.”
RelatÂed ConÂtent:
How the CIA SecretÂly FundÂed Abstract ExpresÂsionÂism DurÂing the Cold War
Jonathan Crow is a Los AngeÂles-based writer and filmÂmakÂer whose work has appeared in Yahoo!, The HolÂlyÂwood Reporter, and othÂer pubÂliÂcaÂtions. You can folÂlow him at @jonccrow. And check out his blog VeepÂtoÂpus, feaÂturÂing vice presÂiÂdents with octoÂpusÂes on their heads. The VeepÂtoÂpus store is here.
So the CIA has an in house magÂaÂzine that is clasÂsiÂfied? I’m havÂing a difÂfiÂcult time underÂstandÂing why.