If you’re one of our philoÂsophÂiÂcalÂly-mindÂed readÂers, you’re perÂhaps already familÂiar with StanÂford proÂfesÂsor John PerÂry. He’s one of the two hosts of the PhiÂlosÂoÂphy Talk radio show that airs on dozens of pubÂlic radio staÂtions across the US. (LisÂten to a recent show here.) PerÂry has the rare abilÂiÂty to bring phiÂlosÂoÂphy down to earth. He also, it turns out, can help you work through some worldÂly probÂlems, like manÂagÂing your tenÂdenÂcy to proÂcrasÂtiÂnate. In a short essay called “StrucÂtured ProÂcrasÂtiÂnaÂtion” — which Marc Andreessen (founder of Netscape, Opsware, Ning, and Andreessen Horowitz) read and called “one of the sinÂgle most proÂfound moments of my entire life” – PerÂry gives some tips for motiÂvatÂing proÂcrasÂtiÂnaÂtors to take care of difÂfiÂcult, timeÂly and imporÂtant tasks. PerÂry’s approach is unorthoÂdox. It involves creÂatÂing a to-do list with theÂoÂretÂiÂcalÂly imporÂtant tasks at the top, and less imporÂtant tasks at the botÂtom. The trick is to proÂcrasÂtiÂnate by avoidÂing the theÂoÂretÂiÂcalÂly imporÂtant tasks (that’s what proÂcrasÂtiÂnaÂtors do) but at least knock off many secÂondary and terÂtiary tasks in the process. The approach involves “conÂstantÂly perÂpeÂtratÂing a pyraÂmid scheme on oneÂself” and essenÂtialÂly “using one charÂacÂter flaw to offÂset the bad effects of anothÂer.” It’s unconÂvenÂtionÂal, to be sure. But Andreesen seems to think it’s a great way to get things done. You can read “StrucÂtured ProÂcrasÂtiÂnaÂtion” here.
Have your proÂcrasÂtiÂnaÂtion tips? Add them to the comÂments secÂtion below. Would love to get your insights.
via LinkedIn
RelatÂed ConÂtent:
The Art of LivÂing: A Free StanÂford Course Explores TimeÂless QuesÂtions
Take First-Class PhiÂlosÂoÂphy CoursÂes AnyÂwhere with Free Oxford PodÂcasts
I was going to make a comÂment but I think I’ll wait ’til latÂer.
I had more imporÂtant things to do than read StrucÂtured ProÂcrasÂtiÂnaÂtion today, but I read the artiÂcle anyÂway. ReadÂing the artiÂcle is a good way to kill time propÂerÂly while thinkÂing about how to kill time more proÂducÂtiveÂly. Thanks for the pointÂer.
I can’t decide whether or not to read it.
I start proÂcrasÂtiÂnatÂing when I have task that’s results are not needÂed, neiÂther for me nor for anyÂbody else. ForÂmal things, supÂportÂing the ideas of someÂbody else because of duty, not because of my conÂvicÂtion. Things that are not interÂestÂing and not suitÂed to me, but I have to do them. When the task hasÂn’t any visÂiÂble meanÂing or it is too comÂpliÂcatÂed to find even the hidÂden meanÂing of it for me, then I become an expert in proÂcrasÂtiÂnaÂtion. ActuÂalÂly first two times I do even such tasks with enerÂgy, but for the third time the proÂcrasÂtiÂnaÂtion starts… When the task doesÂn’t fit into our indiÂvidÂual Maslow’s pyraÂmid we start to streak. We don’t proÂcrasÂtiÂnate when realÂly hunÂgry, freezÂing or our lives are in danÂger, not at all. So, we have to stop doing things that we don’t like even if we get some monÂey for them. The only psyÂchoÂlogÂiÂcal trick against proÂcrasÂtiÂnaÂtion is to find a perÂsonÂal meanÂing of any task — why do I do that? That’s all.