The CIA fought most of the Cold War on the culÂturÂal front, recruitÂing operÂaÂtives and placÂing agents in every posÂsiÂble sphere of influÂence, not only abroad but at home as well. As FranÂcis StonÂer SaunÂders’ book The CulÂturÂal Cold War: the CIA and the World of Arts and LetÂters details, the agency fundÂed intelÂlecÂtuÂals across the politÂiÂcal specÂtrum as well as proÂducÂers of radio, TV, and film. A well-financed proÂpaÂganÂda camÂpaign aimed at the AmerÂiÂcan pubÂlic attemptÂed to perÂsuade the popÂuÂlace that their counÂtry looked exactÂly like its leadÂers wished to see it, a well-run capÂiÂtalÂist machine with equal opporÂtuÂniÂty for all. In addiÂtion to the agency’s varÂiÂous forÂays into jazz and modÂern art, the CIA also helped finance and conÂsultÂed on the proÂducÂtion of aniÂmatÂed films, like the 1954 adapÂtaÂtion of George Orwell’s AniÂmal Farm we recentÂly feaÂtured. We’ve also postÂed on othÂer aniÂmatÂed proÂpaÂganÂda films made by govÂernÂment agenÂcies, such as A is for Atom, a PR film for nuclear enerÂgy, and Duck and CovÂer, a short sugÂgestÂing that cleanÂliÂness may help citÂiÂzens surÂvive a nuclear war.
Today we bring you three short aniÂmaÂtions fundÂed and comÂmisÂsioned by priÂvate interÂests. These films were made for Arkansas’ HardÂing ColÂlege (now HardÂing UniÂverÂsiÂty) and financed by longÂtime GenÂerÂal Motors CEO Alfred P. Sloan. The name probÂaÂbly sounds familÂiar. Today the Alfred P. Sloan FounÂdaÂtion genÂerÂousÂly supÂports pubÂlic radio and teleÂviÂsion, as well as medÂical research and othÂer altruÂisÂtic projects. In the post-war years, Sloan, wideÂly conÂsidÂered “the father of the modÂern corÂpoÂraÂtion,” writes Karl Cohen in a two-part essay for AniÂmaÂtion World NetÂwork, supÂposÂedÂly took a shine to the bootÂstrapÂping presÂiÂdent of HardÂing, George S. BenÂson, a ChrisÂtÂian misÂsionÂary and cruÂsadÂing anti-ComÂmuÂnist who used his posiÂtion to proÂmote God, famÂiÂly, and counÂtry. AccordÂing to Cohen, Sloan donatÂed sevÂerÂal hunÂdred thouÂsand dolÂlars to HardÂing as fundÂing for “eduÂcaÂtionÂal anti-ComÂmuÂnist, pro-free enterÂprise sysÂtem films.” ConÂtractÂed by the colÂlege, proÂducÂer John SutherÂland, forÂmer DisÂney writer, made nine films in all. As you’ll see in the title card that opens each short, these were ostenÂsiÂbly made “to creÂate a deepÂer underÂstandÂing of what has made AmerÂiÂca the finest place in the world to live.” At the top, watch 1949’s “Why Play Leap Frog?” and just above, see anothÂer of the HardÂing films, “Meet King Joe,” also from 1949.
Just above, watch a third of the HardÂing proÂpaÂganÂda films, “Make Mine FreeÂdom,” from 1948. Each of these films, callÂing themÂselves “Fun and Facts about AmerÂiÂca,” present simÂplisÂtic patriÂotÂic stoÂries with an authorÂiÂtaÂtive narÂraÂtor who patientÂly explains the ins and outs of AmerÂiÂcan excepÂtionÂalÂism. “Why Play Leapfrog?” tells the stoÂry of Joe, a disÂgrunÂtled doll-facÂtoÂry workÂer who learns some imporÂtant lessons about the supÂply chain, wages, and prices. He also learns that he’d betÂter work hardÂer to increase his proÂducÂtivÂiÂty (and coopÂerÂate with manÂageÂment) if he wants to keep up with the risÂing cost of livÂing. “Meet King Joe” introÂduces us to the “king of the workÂers of the world,” so called because he can buy more stuff than the poor schlubs in othÂer counÂtries. Joe, “no smarter” and “no stronger than workÂers in othÂer lands” has such advanÂtages only because of, you guessed it, the wonÂders of capÂiÂtalÂism. “Make Mine FreeÂdom” reminds viewÂers of their ConÂstiÂtuÂtionÂal rights before introÂducÂing us to a snake oil charÂlaÂtan sellÂing “ism,” a ComÂmie-like tonÂic, to a group of U.S. labor disputants—if only they’ll sign over their rights and propÂerÂty. The assemÂbled crowd jumps at the chance, but then along comes John Q. PubÂlic, who won’t give up his freeÂdom for “some importÂed douÂble-talk.”
You can read much more about the relaÂtionÂship between Sloan and BenÂson and the othÂer films SutherÂland proÂduced with Sloan’s monÂey, in Cohen’s essay, which also includes inforÂmaÂtion on Cold War aniÂmatÂed proÂpaÂganÂda films made by WarnÂer BrothÂers and DisÂney.
RelatÂed ConÂtent:
A is for Atom: VinÂtage PR Film for Nuclear EnerÂgy
How a Clean, Tidy Home Can Help You SurÂvive the AtomÂic Bomb: A Cold War Film from 1954
Josh Jones is a writer and musiÂcian based in Durham, NC. FolÂlow him at @jdmagness
ProÂpaÂganÂda films, yes, but might not hurt some peoÂple to watch these again. Check out the 1:19 mark of “Make Mine FreeÂdom”.
Even back in the hardÂcore days of McCarthy’s AmerÂiÂca, someÂthings were at least proÂpaÂganÂdized as holy.
And now the corÂpoÂrate world triÂumphs, not by makÂing films about itself, but by sucÂceedÂing in being the cenÂtral fact of our lives for which litÂerÂaÂture and film have found no image.
You can call this proÂpaÂganÂda but it at least the first video “Leap Frog” is mostÂly a basic eduÂcaÂtion most of the US adult popÂuÂlaÂtion realÂly needs. Ok, is it a litÂtle over the top with the coopÂerÂaÂtion of labor and manÂageÂment to get proÂducÂtivÂiÂty gains? Sure
But the basic idea of costs and that the only way for labor to get a real income increase comes from proÂducÂtivÂiÂty gains is someÂthing most adults in the US don’t get. I am willÂing to bet if you took a surÂvey of US adults they have no idea how small the embedÂded profÂit is in any givÂen price of a good. LikeÂwise they will have no idea how much of the price is made up of the accuÂmuÂlatÂed labor costs.
More imporÂtantÂly as a perÂson who has been a superÂviÂsor who has had to tell peoÂple what their raisÂes year after year they have no clue what it takes to get them a raise. I work in a proÂfesÂsionÂal serÂvice indusÂtry with busiÂness majors as employÂees and many of them seem unable to underÂstand.
The conÂverÂsaÂtion goes the same. EmployÂee: Why aren’t our raisÂes largÂer? Me: You draft the bills for your clients are we raisÂing prices by 3–5% like you would to see your raise? EmployÂee: No Me: So can the comÂpaÂny’s labor costs go up faster then revÂenue growth for every long? EmployÂee: No
What is amazÂing the employÂees that comÂplain the most and get this the least are the ones that resist our tryÂing to train them on new softÂware that will allow them to serÂvice more clients. If perÂson can take on 1 or 2 new clients because of softÂware upgrades then our gross revÂenue per employÂee can go up enough to offer betÂter raisÂes.
It is amazÂing how few employÂees don’t see that fact. This video explains that basic realÂiÂty and more adults in this counÂtry need to know this.