HumanÂiÂty has long ponÂdered the relÂaÂtive might of the pen and the sword. While one time-worn aphoÂrism does grant the advanÂtage to the pen, most of us have enterÂtained doubts: the sword, metaphorÂiÂcalÂly or litÂerÂalÂly, seems to have won out across an awfulÂly wide swath of hisÂtoÂry. Still, the pen has scored some impresÂsive vicÂtoÂries, some even in livÂing memÂoÂry. Take, for examÂple, the CIA’s recentÂly revealed use of Boris PasterÂnak’s novÂel DocÂtor ZhivaÂgo as a proÂpaÂganÂda weapon. Repressed in PasterÂnak’s native RusÂsia, the book first appeared in Italy in 1957. The folÂlowÂing year, the British sugÂgestÂed to AmerÂiÂca’s CenÂtral IntelÂliÂgence Agency that the book stood a decent chance of winÂning hearts and minds behind the Iron CurÂtain — if, of course, they could get a few copies in there. A CIA memo sent across its own SoviÂet RusÂsia DiviÂsion subÂseÂquentÂly proÂnounced DocÂtor ZhivaÂgo as posÂsessed of “great proÂpaÂganÂda valÂue, not only for its intrinÂsic mesÂsage and thought-proÂvokÂing nature, but also for the cirÂcumÂstances of its pubÂliÂcaÂtion. We have the opporÂtuÂniÂty to make SoviÂet citÂiÂzens wonÂder what is wrong with their govÂernÂment, when a fine litÂerÂary work by the man acknowlÂedged to be the greatÂest livÂing RussÂian writer is not even availÂable in his own counÂtry in his own lanÂguage for his own peoÂple to read.”
That evalÂuÂaÂtion comes from one of the over 130 declasÂsiÂfied docÂuÂments used by Peter Finn and Petra CouÂvĂ©e in their brand new hisÂtoÂry of this act of real-life litÂerÂary espiÂonage, The ZhivaÂgo Affair: The KremÂlin, the CIA and the BatÂtle Over a ForÂbidÂden Book. You can read an in-depth artiÂcle on some of the events involved in this operÂaÂtion — the CIA’s printÂing of both hardÂcovÂer and miniaÂture paperÂback RussÂian-lanÂguage ediÂtions, the not-so-clanÂdesÂtine disÂtriÂbÂuÂtion of copies at 1958’s BrusÂsels UniÂverÂsal and InterÂnaÂtionÂal ExpoÂsiÂtion, the CIA’s unexÂpectÂed alliance with the VatÂiÂcan in this misÂsion, the inept probÂing by SoviÂet “researchers” — at the WashÂingÂton Post.
You can also watch a CBS This MornÂing clip on the book just above. DraÂmatÂic though this “ZhivaÂgo Affair” sounds, it came as neiÂther the first nor last AmerÂiÂcan use of culÂture as a means of destaÂbiÂlizÂing the SoviÂet Union. We’ve even preÂviÂousÂly feaÂtured two othÂers: secretÂly-fundÂed abstract expresÂsionÂist paintÂing, and Louis ArmÂstrong’s 1965 East Berlin and Budapest conÂcerts. Cold War AmerÂiÂca may have had the sword, in the form of its vast nuclear arseÂnal, polÂished and ready, but clearÂly it retained a cerÂtain regard for the pen — and brush, and trumÂpet — as well.
RelatÂed ConÂtent:
Louis ArmÂstrong Plays HisÂtoric Cold War ConÂcerts in East Berlin & Budapest (1965)
How the CIA SecretÂly FundÂed Abstract ExpresÂsionÂism DurÂing the Cold War
ColÂin MarÂshall hosts and proÂduces NoteÂbook on Cities and CulÂture and writes essays on cities, lanÂguage, Asia, and men’s style. He’s at work on a book about Los AngeÂles, A Los AngeÂles Primer. FolÂlow him on TwitÂter at @colinmarshall or on FaceÂbook.
Leave a Reply