“EveryÂone has quesÂtions about the econÂoÂmy. I startÂed lookÂing for the answers in ecoÂnomÂics. I found enough insights to get me interÂestÂed, but I couldÂn’t seem to make the insights add up. I went back to the origÂiÂnal sources, the great econÂoÂmists, and startÂed to see a big picÂture. And while the whole picÂture was comÂpliÂcatÂed, no one part of it was all that hard to underÂstand. I could see that all this inforÂmaÂtion made a stoÂry. But I couldÂn’t find a book that told the stoÂry in an accesÂsiÂble way. So I decidÂed to write one, in the most accesÂsiÂble form I knew: comics.”
Thus begins Michael GoodÂwin’s new book Economix: How Our EconÂoÂmy Works (and DoesÂn’t Work) in Words and PicÂtures.
The book covÂers two (plus) cenÂturies of ecoÂnomÂic hisÂtoÂry. It starts with the PhysÂiocrats, Adam Smith and theÂoÂretÂiÂcal develÂopÂment of capÂiÂtalÂism, and then steams ahead into the 19th cenÂtuÂry, covÂerÂing the IndusÂtriÂal RevÂoÂluÂtion, the rise of big busiÂness and big finance. Next comes the action packed 20th cenÂtuÂry: the Great DepresÂsion, the New Deal, the threat from ComÂmuÂnism durÂing the Cold War, the tax reforms of the ReaÂgan era, and evenÂtuÂalÂly the crash of 2008 and OccuÂpy Wall Street. Along the way, GoodÂwin and the illusÂtraÂtor Dan E. Burr demysÂtiÂfy the ecoÂnomÂic theÂoÂries of figÂures like RicarÂdo, Marx, Malthus, Keynes, FriedÂman and Hayek — all in a subÂstanÂtive but approachÂable way.
As with most treatÂments of modÂern ecoÂnomÂics, the book starts with Adam Smith. To get a feel for GoodÂwin’s approach, you can dive into the first chapÂter of Economix, which grapÂples with Smith’s theÂoÂries about the free marÂket, diviÂsion of labor and the InvisÂiÂble Hand. Economix can be purÂchased online here.
If you would like to sign up for Open Culture’s free email newsletÂter, please find it here. Or folÂlow our posts on Threads, FaceÂbook, BlueSky or Mastodon.
If you would like to supÂport the misÂsion of Open CulÂture, conÂsidÂer makÂing a donaÂtion to our site. It’s hard to rely 100% on ads, and your conÂtriÂbuÂtions will help us conÂtinÂue proÂvidÂing the best free culÂturÂal and eduÂcaÂtionÂal mateÂriÂals to learnÂers everyÂwhere. You can conÂtribute through PayÂPal, PatreÂon, and VenÂmo (@openculture). Thanks!
RelatÂed ConÂtent:
ReadÂing Marx’s CapÂiÂtal with David HarÂvey (Free Course)
Boris JohnÂson could do with takÂing a read.
I would like to know the opinÂion of an econÂoÂmist regardÂing the credÂiÂbilÂiÂty of this book. It seems to me there is some risk for the layÂman readÂer to begin ecoÂnomÂiÂcal eduÂcaÂtion through the eyes of a “free lance writer”. Is he over-simÂpliÂfyÂing theÂoÂries? Does he have a clear underÂstandÂing on the subÂject?
I would like to know the opinÂion of an econÂoÂmist regardÂing the credÂiÂbilÂiÂty of this book. It seems to me there is some risk for the layÂman readÂer to begin ecoÂnomÂiÂcal eduÂcaÂtion through the eyes of a “free lance writer”. Is he over-simÂpliÂfyÂing theÂoÂries? Does he have a clear underÂstandÂing on the subÂject?
I found this quote: nnu201cEconomix is a liveÂly, cheerÂfulÂly opinÂionÂatÂed romp through the hisÂtorÂiÂcal and intelÂlecÂtuÂal founÂdaÂtions of our curÂrent econÂoÂmy and our curÂrent ecoÂnomÂic probÂlems. GoodÂwin has a knack for disÂtillÂing comÂplex ideas and events in ways that invite the readÂer to folÂlow the big picÂture withÂout losÂing track of what actuÂalÂly hapÂpened. Any readÂer wonÂderÂing how our econÂoÂmy got to where it is today will find this a refreshÂing overview.u201dnu2013 TimÂoÂthy W. GuinÂnane, Philip GoldÂen Bartlett ProÂfesÂsor of EcoÂnomÂic HisÂtoÂry, Yale UniÂverÂsiÂty
Nice job, Ivar! Thanks.
I would like to know the opinÂion of an econÂoÂmist regardÂing the credÂiÂbilÂiÂty of this book. It seems to me there is some risk for the layÂman readÂer to begin ecoÂnomÂiÂcal eduÂcaÂtion through the eyes of a “free lance writer”. Is he over-simÂpliÂfyÂing theÂoÂries? Does he have a clear underÂstandÂing on the subÂject?
I would like to know the opinÂion of an econÂoÂmist regardÂing the credÂiÂbilÂiÂty of this book. It seems to me there is some risk for the layÂman readÂer to begin ecoÂnomÂiÂcal eduÂcaÂtion through the eyes of a “free lance writer”. Is he over-simÂpliÂfyÂing theÂoÂries? Does he have a clear underÂstandÂing on the subÂject?
There is a MexÂiÂcan author, EduarÂdo del Rio or Rius, who has a great book called econÂoÂmy for beginÂners in econÂoÂmy. It is a great book and his style is superb. He writes the book as if it were a carÂtoon strip in the newsÂpaÂper with some large clausÂes and many refÂerÂences in his book and involves the readÂer by askÂing rhetoric quesÂtions. I will check this out but as soon as I read the artiÂcle I thought about Rius.
There is a MexÂiÂcan author, EduarÂdo del Rio or Rius, who has a great book called econÂoÂmy for beginÂners in econÂoÂmy. It is a great book and his style is superb. He writes the book as if it were a carÂtoon strip in the newsÂpaÂper with some large clausÂes and many refÂerÂences in his book and involves the readÂer by askÂing rhetoric quesÂtions. I will check this out but as soon as I read the artiÂcle I thought about Rius.
There is a MexÂiÂcan author, EduarÂdo del Rio or Rius, who has a great book called econÂoÂmy for beginÂners in econÂoÂmy. It is a great book and his style is superb. He writes the book as if it were a carÂtoon strip in the newsÂpaÂper with some large clausÂes and many refÂerÂences in his book and involves the readÂer by askÂing rhetoric quesÂtions. I will check this out but as soon as I read the artiÂcle I thought about Rius.
The InvisÂiÂble Hand — from The TheÂoÂry of Moral SenÂtiÂments (1759)nnu201cThe proÂduce of the soil mainÂtains at all times nearÂly that numÂber of inhabÂiÂtants which it is capaÂble of maintaining.nnThe rich only select from the heap what is most preÂcious and agreeÂable. They conÂsume litÂtle more than the poor, and in spite of their natÂurÂal selfÂishÂness and rapacÂiÂty, though they mean only their own conÂveÂnienÂcy, though the sole end which they proÂpose from the labours of all the thouÂsands whom they employ, be the gratÂiÂfiÂcaÂtion of their own vain and insaÂtiable desires, they divide with the poor the proÂduce of all their improvements.nnThey are led by an invisÂiÂble hand to make nearÂly the same disÂtriÂbÂuÂtion of the necÂesÂsaries of life, which would have been made, had the earth been dividÂed into equal porÂtions among all its inhabÂiÂtants, and thus withÂout intendÂing it, withÂout knowÂing it, advance the interÂest of sociÂety, and afford means to the mulÂtiÂpliÂcaÂtion of the species.u201d