Just the othÂer day, I did the unthinkÂable: I actuÂalÂly watched a pre-video adverÂtiseÂment. The spot, for a major bank, spent its first few minÂutes explainÂing the mechanÂics of credÂit ratÂing. PromisÂing useÂful knowlÂedge, this bank received my attenÂtion in return — for about two thirds of the comÂmerÂcial, anyÂway. The video above, comÂmisÂsioned by a comÂpaÂny called DataÂbarÂracks, does much the same by offerÂing an explaÂnaÂtion of “cloud comÂputÂing,” a conÂcept you’ve sureÂly heard much thrown around over the past sevÂerÂal years. SweetÂenÂing the deal, it uses for its visuÂals a drawn-as-you-watch style of eduÂcaÂtionÂal aniÂmaÂtion you may have encounÂtered here before, and it employs as its narÂraÂtor writer, comeÂdiÂan, and man-about-interÂnet Stephen Fry, from whom I’ve always enjoyed a good explaÂnaÂtion. “Today,” he begins, “we are in the midÂdle of a revÂoÂluÂtion in busiÂness comÂputÂing.”
In serÂvice of this theÂsis, he then goes back to 2700 BC, when the SumeÂriÂans inventÂed the abaÂcus, conÂtinÂuÂing on through LeonarÂdo da VinÂci’s plans for a mechanÂiÂcal calÂcuÂlaÂtor, Charles BabÂbage’s difÂferÂence engine, Alan TurÂing and TomÂmy FlowÂers’ forÂward-lookÂing sepÂaÂraÂtion of hardÂware from softÂware, and Tim BernÂers-Lee’s realÂizaÂtion that comÂputÂers could operÂate on someÂthing like a neurÂal netÂwork — someÂthing like this very World Wide Web. We then see and hear an analÂoÂgy made between comÂputÂing and elecÂtricÂiÂty. Where once firms wantÂiÂng to use elecÂtricÂiÂty had to build and mainÂtain their own burÂdenÂsome powÂer plants, now they have elecÂtricÂiÂty as a utilÂiÂty, payÂing only for what they need at the time. And while firms have mainÂly, up to this point, purÂchased and operÂatÂed their own stores of comÂputÂing powÂer, doing it cloud-style will free them all to pay for that, too, as a utilÂiÂty. A bold pitch, perÂhaps, but everyÂthing sounds reaÂsonÂable — inevitable, even — comÂing from Stephen Fry.
RelatÂed ConÂtent:
Stephen Fry: What I Wish I Knew When I Was 18
Stephen Fry IntroÂduces the Strange New World of Nanoscience
ColÂin MarÂshall hosts and proÂduces NoteÂbook on Cities and CulÂture and writes essays on litÂerÂaÂture, film, cities, Asia, and aesÂthetÂics. He’s at work on a book about Los AngeÂles, A Los AngeÂles Primer. FolÂlow him on TwitÂter at @colinmarshall.
This is a great preÂsenÂtaÂtion. UnforÂtuÂnateÂly, it’s already been proven wrong, because data and powÂer are not equivÂaÂlent. Data secuÂriÂty canÂnot be delivÂered as easÂiÂly as powÂer can; cloud comÂputÂing is a great way to have your crown jewÂels stolen. It does work for cerÂtain sorts of appliÂcaÂtions, but is not genÂerÂalÂly applicÂaÂble, even though its proÂpoÂnents would very much like us to believe it is. I use a “cloud” serÂvice; I don’t put anyÂthing on it that could cost me monÂey if it were stolen.
It is a utilÂiÂty. But as you say there is the issue of trust. And that comes from reliÂaÂbilÂiÂty and secuÂriÂty. nnOnce peoÂple start seeÂing cloud serÂvices as secure and reliÂable the mass adopÂtion will begin.nnIm sure it was the same with elecÂtricÂiÂty and water supÂply too.
If peoÂple see cloud serÂvices as reliÂable and secure when they aren’t, that’s a bad outÂcome. And at present they aren’t, for a variÂety of reaÂsons.
I’m very conÂcerned by what you call “a bad outÂcome”: a knowlÂedge manÂageÂment serÂvice “user” should nevÂer be equatÂed [?] to a powÂer supÂply “user”.
Right, but that’s preÂciseÂly what they’re doing here.
Thomas EdiÂson did not invent the lightÂbulb, there were a couÂple of dozen that pre-datÂed his comÂmerÂcialÂly sucÂcessÂful verÂsion.
StephenÂnÂFry is truÂly amazÂing, though I donu2019t know about its user friendÂliÂness. His toneÂnis perÂfect. HowÂevÂer, only artists know about true art, thatu2019s whynBroadcast2world has that parÂticÂuÂlar finesse that ensures aniÂmatÂed videos get annapÂplause that I got for my comÂpaÂny. I donu2019t know if any do it yourÂself methÂodÂsnwould receive it, or be so memÂoÂrable. nThe probÂlem with the latÂter approach is that peoÂple might rememÂber thenanÂiÂmaÂtion but forÂget the brand.