Simon RapÂer at Drunks & LampÂposts has comÂposed a data visuÂalÂizaÂtion of the relaÂtions of influÂence among philosoÂphers. This was put togethÂer to demonÂstrate RapÂer’s data extracÂtion algoÂrithm; he colÂlectÂed the conÂtents of all the “influÂenced by” fields on Wikipedia, disÂplayÂing each philosoÂpher as a node conÂnectÂed to all othÂer philosoÂphers that he or she influÂenced. The more conÂnecÂtions, the bigÂger the node. The result is visuÂalÂly fasÂciÂnatÂing and an interÂestÂing touchÂstone for phiÂlosÂoÂphy fans.
Who was more imporÂtant, Edmund Husserl or Jean-Paul Sartre? Well, you may not have heard of Husserl, but the size of his node is a bit bigÂger than Sartre’s, so accordÂing to the graph, he’s had more of an influÂence on the proÂfesÂsion. The fact that HusserÂl’s heyÂday was thirÂty years earÂliÂer than Sartre’s may explain that fact, but as Mark De SilÂva at the New York Times OpinÂionÂater points out, it’s also unclear how well these “influÂenced by” relaÂtions in Wikipedia corÂreÂlate with real influÂences in the hisÂtoÂry of phiÂlosÂoÂphy. RapÂer’s graph seems to proÂvide an excelÂlent start for ponÂderÂing the quesÂtion. More graphs by hisÂtorÂiÂcal periÂod can be found here.
Mark LinÂsenÂmayÂer appears on The ParÂtialÂly ExamÂined Life PhiÂlosÂoÂphy PodÂcast, offerÂing liveÂly, in-depth introÂducÂtions to Husserl, Sartre, and many othÂer figÂures in phiÂlosÂoÂphy.
Yes, totalÂly reliÂable!
I knew that Che GueÂvara was a philosoÂpher
That SausÂsure and Piaget had much less influÂence than, say, DerÂriÂda
That the entire stoÂicism had a very small influÂence on westÂern thought
That MurÂray RothÂbard was slightÂly more imporÂtant than Thomas Aquinas
:)
This only tells how useÂless the “influÂenced by” tag is, if comÂplied by non-proÂfesÂsionÂals
Where is Albert EinÂstein (RelÂaÂtivÂiÂty theÂoÂry)? Where is Isaac NewÂton? (laws of motion). Where is Claude ShanÂnon (InforÂmaÂtion theÂoÂry)? Where is TurÂing (theÂoÂry of comÂpuÂtaÂtion)?
These three caused revÂoÂluÂtions of thought that changed the 20th cenÂtuÂry and beyond.
This is very relatÂed to a visuÂalÂizaÂtion project in which we visuÂalÂized influÂences and simÂiÂlarÂiÂties among philosoÂphers, painters and musiÂcians. We used simÂiÂlarÂiÂty in interÂest (or time) as implicÂit relaÂtions and directÂed influÂence conÂnecÂtions as explicÂit relaÂtions. We decidÂed against showÂing all the links all the time in favor of difÂferÂenÂtiÂatÂing between incomÂing and outÂgoÂing influÂences. Check it out: http://mariandoerk.de/edgemaps/demo
This is probÂaÂbly more repÂreÂsenÂtaÂtive of the areas of interÂest or knowlÂedge of the Wiki ediÂtors than of realÂiÂty.
RETITLUNG AND OR WIDENING THE SCOPE IF THE CANON OF OHILOSOPHY :
INTRO
To begin with;I appreÂciÂate the rather relaxed; enlightÂened ;soneÂtimes origÂiÂnal and light-heartÂed conÂtent approachÂes here.
EuroÂpean conÂtriÂbuÂtions to the study of phiÂlosÂoÂphy is immense.And the world is grateÂful for the archival and curÂrent conÂtemÂpoÂrary largesse of Europe in this .
I would like to sugÂgest that you retiÂtle your name to” TreaÂtisÂes of EuroÂpean PhiÂlosÂoÂphy”
You seem to have approÂpriÂatÂed the word phiÂlosÂoÂphy as to be of and emaÂnatÂing from only your parochial limÂitÂed world where only 10% of humanÂiÂty resides.
Let us do ourÂselves ;our next genÂerÂaÂtion by widenÂing the scope of OpenCulture.com .
Include withÂin the horiÂzons of ohiÂlosÂoÂphy non-EuroÂpean conÂtriÂbuÂtions from Africa;from Asia;from The AmerÂiÂcÂas etc.
PhiÂlosÂoÂphy cones natÂuÂralÂly to all of humanÂiÂty (and may be also to aniÂmals) whether it gets pubÂlished and “reecognized“or not or whether it is recordÂed in this or that milieu or forÂmat.
POVERTY OF TGE CANON OF OHILOSOPHY
It is poverÂty in the purÂsuit of the study of philosoohy anyÂwhere in the wirld when we focus only on priÂmarÂiÂly men;focus on the bougeois upper midÂdle class ;on only availÂable pubÂlished mateÂrÂiÂal .
PoverÂty here can be easÂiÂly gitÂten rid of by widenÂing the scope of the purÂsuit of tthe study of phiÂlosÂoÂphy.
Thanks
Pls ignore some typos above
I just learn the site of Open CulÂture and hope to find any valid explaÂnaÂtion on the sigÂnifÂiÂcant regresÂsion of the WestÂern phiÂlosÂoÂphy influÂence to a staÂtus simÂiÂlar to the latin tongue i.e.
near a dead culÂture regardÂing the enlightÂenÂment and safeÂguard of our mankind.
Worst nowaÂdays WestÂern phiÂlosÂoÂphy has turned out to be a joke as most WestÂerns reliÂgions have become. And this is very sad to the mankind.