Just when you think you’ve had enough Neil deGrasse Tyson, anothÂer not-to-miss video comes along. This one comes from the 2006 Beyond Belief ConÂferÂence, and it feaÂtures the astroÂphysiÂcist givÂing what’s been called the “greatÂest sciÂence serÂmon ever.” As a youngÂster, Tyson stepped into the HayÂden PlanÂeÂtarÂiÂum (the instiÂtuÂtion he now runs) and he felt an unshakÂable callÂing to study the uniÂverse. It wasÂn’t unlike the feelÂing someÂone underÂgoes when they’re reliÂgiousÂly born again. And ever since, Tyson has expeÂriÂenced revÂeÂlaÂtion after revÂeÂlaÂtion, epiphany after epiphany, when studyÂing the uniÂverse, and espeÂcialÂly whenÂevÂer he’s remindÂed that, chemÂiÂcalÂly speakÂing, we are in the uniÂverse, and the uniÂverse is in us. We’re all made of the same starÂdust. How can that not leave us with an incredÂiÂbly spirÂiÂtuÂal feelÂing?
RelatÂed ConÂtent:
Neil deGrasse Tyson Lists 8 (Free) Books Every IntelÂliÂgent PerÂson Should Read
Stephen ColÂbert Talks SciÂence with AstroÂphysiÂcist Neil deGrasse Tyson
Neil deGrasse Tyson & Richard Dawkins PonÂder the Big EnchiÂlaÂda QuesÂtions of SciÂence
Tyson is a nationÂal treaÂsure, just like his hero, Carl Sagan, was.
No-one would ever disÂpute that Tyson is a treaÂsure. But you seem to be pushÂing him endÂlessÂly of late. It almost seems like a fixÂaÂtion. Go easy, folks. SomeÂtimes less is more.
Thank you so much for postÂing this. I stumÂbled upon Neil a couÂple years ago and still revisÂit this talk and learn someÂthing new every time.
In regards to the above comÂment, I have had simÂiÂlar thoughts but then couldÂn’t rememÂber how I first found Tyson and realÂized that any thing that gets him more covÂerÂage is a great thing. His mesÂsage is nothÂing but proÂmotÂing honÂest intelÂlecÂtuÂal inquiry among all. The more peoÂple who know about this man, the betÂter.
…and for anyÂbody who likes this, the full talk is availÂable, either on youtube or on the Beyond Belief site itself.
John, I agree with you. Tyson is good, but watchÂing him someÂtimes makes me wonÂder if he is realÂly more interÂestÂed in inspirÂing awe and wonÂder in the cosÂmos, or genÂerÂatÂing awe and fanÂfare for himÂself. PretÂty subÂtle, but it is unmisÂtakÂably there.
he talks about stars because he is a star. one of those star physiÂcists you might say
“Called by the uniÂverse?” Dr NdGT here is getÂting all religious/ new agey about the cosÂmos. And “We all are chilÂdren of the heavÂenÂly father” and “we are all from the cenÂtre of a star” begin to sound simÂiÂlar. SciÂenÂtists need to be skepÂtiÂcal about these sprituÂal feelÂings that he is talkÂing about: it may inspire sciÂenÂtifÂic descovÂery, it also is the most beguilÂing and seducÂtive mush. Lets stay groundÂed folks — the ground is where the probÂlems are.
It is one way to get through to the reliÂgious who don’t believe in sciÂence.
“Just when you think you’ve had enough Neil deGrasse Tyson…”
I haven’t.