UpdatÂed on DecemÂber 24, 2013: YesÂterÂday the British govÂernÂment brought a sad chapÂter to a close when it finalÂly issued a posthuÂmous parÂdon to Alan TurÂing, who was conÂvictÂed in 1952 of breakÂing laws that crimÂiÂnalÂized homoÂsexÂuÂalÂiÂty. The post you see below was origÂiÂnalÂly writÂten in FebÂruÂary, 2012, when the quesÂtion of TurÂing being parÂdoned was still up for debate. The film feaÂtured above is still very much worth your while.
This week the British govÂernÂment finalÂly parÂdoned Alan TurÂing. One of the greatÂest mathÂeÂmatiÂcians of the 20th cenÂtuÂry, TurÂing laid the founÂdaÂtions for comÂputÂer sciÂence and played a key role in breakÂing the Nazi EnigÂma code durÂing World War II. In 1952 he was conÂvictÂed of homoÂsexÂuÂalÂiÂty. He killed himÂself two years latÂer, after being chemÂiÂcalÂly casÂtratÂed by the govÂernÂment.
On MonÂday, JusÂtice MinÂisÂter Tom McNalÂly told the House of Lords that the govÂernÂment of Prime MinÂisÂter David Cameron stood by the deciÂsion of earÂliÂer govÂernÂments to deny a parÂdon, notÂing that the preÂviÂous prime minÂisÂter, GorÂdon Brown, had already issued an “unequivÂoÂcal posthuÂmous apolÂoÂgy” to TurÂing. McNalÂly was quotÂed in the Guardian:
A posthuÂmous parÂdon was not conÂsidÂered approÂpriÂate as Alan TurÂing was propÂerÂly conÂvictÂed of what at the time was a crimÂiÂnal offense. He would have known that his offense was against the law and that he would be prosÂeÂcutÂed. It is tragÂic that Alan TurÂing was conÂvictÂed of an offense which now seems both cruÂel and absurd–particularly poignant givÂen his outÂstandÂing conÂtriÂbuÂtion to the war effort. HowÂevÂer, the law at the time required a prosÂeÂcuÂtion and, as such, long-standÂing polÂiÂcy has been to accept that such conÂvicÂtions took place and, rather than tryÂing to alter the hisÂtorÂiÂcal conÂtext and to put right what canÂnot be put right, ensure instead that we nevÂer again return to those times.
The deciÂsion came as a disÂapÂpointÂment to thouÂsands of peoÂple around the world who had petiÂtioned for a forÂmal parÂdon durÂing the cenÂteÂnary year of TurÂing’s birth. The Guardian also quotÂed an email sent by AmerÂiÂcan mathÂeÂmatiÂcian DenÂnis Hejhal to a British colÂleague:
i see that the House of Lords rejectÂed the parÂdon Feb 6 on what are forÂmal grounds.
if law is X on date D, and you knowÂingÂly break law X on date D, then you canÂnot be parÂdoned (no matÂter how wrong or flawed law X is).
the real reaÂson is OBVIOUS. they do not want thouÂsands of old men sayÂing parÂdon us too.
Efforts to obtain a parÂdon for TurÂing are conÂtinÂuÂing. British citÂiÂzens and UK resÂiÂdents can still sign the petiÂtion.
To learn more about TurÂing’s life, you can watch the 1996 BBC film BreakÂing the Code (above, in its entireÂty), feaÂturÂing Derek JacoÂbi as TurÂing and Nobel Prize-winÂning playÂwright Harold PinÂter as the mysÂteÂriÂous “Man from the MinÂistry.” DirectÂed by HerÂbert Wise, the film is based on a 1986 play by Hugh WhiteÂmore, which in turn was based on Andrew Hodge’s 1983 book Alan TurÂing: The EnigÂma.
BreakÂing the Code moves back and forth between two time frames and two very difÂferÂent codes: one milÂiÂtary, the othÂer social. The film runs 91 minÂutes, and has been added to our colÂlecÂtion of Free Movies Online.
I actuÂalÂly disÂagree. To be parÂdoned, one must first have done someÂthing wrong. It is an act of clemenÂcy or forÂgiveÂness for a wrongÂdoÂer. For the UK govÂernÂment to parÂdon TurÂing would actuÂalÂly be to reinÂforce the posiÂtion that he was in the wrong, which would be inapÂproÂpriÂate.
The approÂpriÂate response is actuÂalÂly an unreÂserved apolÂoÂgy, which the govÂernÂment has already issued.
I agree with F B Toast. When I first heard about this issue, I thought it was about the govÂernÂment apolÂoÂgizÂing to TurÂing. How ironÂic.
How could a parÂdon reinÂforce it? He was wrong accordÂing to the law, it was reinÂforced by appliÂcaÂtion of that law, regardÂless of a parÂdon. An apolÂoÂgy seems to be mereÂly moral whereÂas a parÂdon is also legal.
Alan only do the things in right way. He not only break the war or social code, actuÂalÂly he gives a new dimenÂsion of TRUTH. AccepÂtence as a socialÂly boundÂed man is time dependent.Now social secinero is change, and it has to be changed by time only.His valuÂable opinion(code) we could not accept that time.But now we should PARDON.
How fanÂtasÂtic that this petiÂtion has aroused such interÂest in TurÂing and his sciÂence. ThouÂsands of peoÂple who nevÂer knew about TurÂing and still strugÂgle to underÂstand his legaÂcy. And such interÂestÂing disÂcusÂsions. Nice blog, actuÂalÂly manÂages to avoid getÂting its TurÂing facts wrong! TurÂing Year is going to be great, and the petiÂtion is a valuÂable ingreÂdiÂent.
A parÂdon (with accomÂpaÂnyÂing explaÂnaÂtion) could recÂogÂnize that the law was immoral, which it was. Would you simÂiÂlarÂly argue against the parÂdon of a runÂaway slave?
An odd deciÂsion from a parÂliaÂment filled with men who have always had a penÂchant for dressÂing in napÂpies and being spanked by latex-clad nanÂnies.
Well, they evenÂtuÂalÂly reversed themÂselves, as per this artiÂcle in The Guardian:
http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2013/jul/19/enigma-codebreaker-alan-turing-posthumous-pardon
And anothÂer artiÂcle on the subÂject:
Alan TurÂing ParÂdoned By the UK For Being Gay, 50 Years Too Late
http://www.policymic.com/articles/55949/alan-turing-pardoned-by-the-uk-for-being-gay-50-years-too-late
Law is not a sciÂence. It is a sysÂtem of authorÂiÂty and worse, of polÂiÂtics. It is appalling that the UK took so many years to “parÂdon” TurÂing.
The quoÂtaÂtion from the Guardian is quite curiÂous. TurÂing was justÂly conÂvictÂed because at that time, his conÂduct vioÂlatÂed the law.
An imperÂfect anaÂlog. On what grounds did the NuremÂberg judges issue judgÂments to kill human beings who preÂsumÂably who were actÂing conÂsisÂtent with municÂiÂpal law, no matÂter how misÂguidÂed that law might have been.
play
What a conÂsidÂerÂate and incluÂsive site, realÂly nice, thank you!