After yesÂterÂday’s post, I’ll nevÂer get a sniff of a TED conÂferÂence. But even so, we’ll keep feaÂturÂing Ted Talks from time to time, and so why not today? Above, we have TED’s Chris AnderÂson interÂviewÂing Julian Assange, founder of WikÂiLeaks, the whisÂtle-blowÂing webÂsite that made headÂlines last month when it released the Afghan War Diaries, all 92,000 pages worth. DurÂing the 19 minute interÂview, Assange talks a litÂtle more about the phiÂlosÂoÂphy behind WikÂiLeaks, how the orgaÂniÂzaÂtion decides when to release inforÂmaÂtion (or not), how the site has changed world events, and what some more ordiÂnary leaks look like. No matÂter what stance you take on WikÂiLeaks, the interÂview is worth a watch. You’ll only hear more about them down the line.
This guy doesÂn’t underÂstand the impliÂcaÂtions of his actions. It is all about his ego. He like the attenÂtion being givÂen him by peoÂple who don’t underÂstand how clasÂsiÂfied inforÂmaÂtion can be deadÂly to the sources and methÂods revealed withÂin the docÂuÂmenÂtaÂtion.
Did you notice they only showed the part that idenÂtiÂfied the reporters and then the apache firÂing on them. If you watch the full video, you will see that the reporters are with armed insurÂgents, there are AK-47’s and one guy has an RPG in a neighÂborÂhood and they are waitÂing to attack U.S. troops headÂed their direcÂtion.
I can’t wait for someÂone to expose this guy as the scumÂbag he is. He is endganÂgerÂing milÂiÂtary memÂbers lives who are in othÂer counÂtries and exposÂing inforÂmaÂtion that is kept secret for a reaÂson. If you rememÂber from grade school, we had peoÂple who did the same thing and what did we call them, a tatÂtle-tale.
In the crimÂiÂnal world, a tatÂtle-tale is a snitch or a rat. His orgaÂniÂzaÂtion is makÂing it easÂiÂer for peoÂple to illeÂgalÂly release clasÂsiÂfied inforÂmaÂtion withÂout reperÂcusÂsion and this video is essenÂtialÂly letÂting the world know he is open for busiÂness.
The heliÂcopters shouldÂn’t have been there. The Reuters reporters weren’t planÂning to attack along.
If meant with purÂposeÂful need, their is no shame in disÂclosÂing the truth. The real quesÂtion being: Why hide when it was necÂesÂsary and already done?
@Hate IgnoÂrance
I don’t parÂticÂuÂlarÂly like the guy, and have mixed feelÂing about some of the things he has leaked, but I am absoluteÂly appalled by some of the reacÂtions I have seen.
I too rememÂber the schoolÂyard and taunts of “tell-tale”. I also rememÂber that it was genÂerÂalÂly used by bulÂlies or othÂer peoÂple doing things they shouldÂn’t have tryÂing to avoid what they had done comÂing to light and tryÂing to place the guilt on the perÂson who told on them.
I also rememÂber being told to stand up for the truth and what is right in the face of bulÂlies.
There is an old sayÂing about not shootÂing the mesÂsenÂger (which some politiÂcians have been conÂtraÂdictÂing in the most chillÂing terms in calls to assasÂsiÂnate Assange for pubÂlishÂing some docÂuÂments, when they seem hapÂpy to let nuclear-armed dicÂtaÂtors to carÂry on their merÂry way, and let their incomÂpeÂtent colÂleagues who are directÂly responsÂble for unnecÂesÂsary milÂiÂtary and civilÂian deaths get away with it).
Lots of what is comÂing out is not nationÂal secuÂriÂty, it’s dirty launÂdry. It’s what govÂernÂments don’t want their own peoÂple to know.
You want a world where news agenÂcies will have to worÂry about being prosÂeÂcutÂed for pubÂlishÂing the truth when the source is a leak? Or just the truths you don’t like?
ConÂvieniÂant that they comÂpleteÂly omit the parts of the chopÂper video where the guys are watchÂing the chopÂper, peekÂing around corÂners and pointÂing unidenÂtiÂfied (Quite posÂsiÂbly weapons) directÂly at the chopÂper.
Then the 10–20 secÂonds they take to inform comÂmand and get the ok to open fire.
REAAAAAL conÂvieniÂant.
@Taqwa If they ommitÂed those porÂtions, how did u see them?